Jiang Xue QinApr 16, 2026The United States military, after its traumatic withdrawal from the Vietnam War in 1973, developed a doctrine of warfare specifically designed to circumvent the perceived "shackles of democracy." Generals, feeling betrayed by public dissent and political vacillation during the 1965-1973 conflict, sought a new way to wage war without requiring popular consent or incurring high, visible casualties. This ambition culminated in the "shock and awe" strategy, seemingly validated by the swift 2003 Iraq War. Yet, the question remains: will this doctrine, born from a desire to maintain empire without guilt, lead the Pentagon to embrace a potentially disastrous conflict with Iran, despite its historical unsuitability for such complex, mountainous terrain?
Despite his unparalleled military victories and sweeping reforms designed to restore stability to Rome, Julius Caesar was assassinated in 44 BCE by his closest friends and allies. His radical success in shaping a new vision for the Republic inadvertently generated profound discomfort and anxiety among the old guard. Caesar's attempts to 'make Rome great again' by crafting a new reality challenged deeply ingrained Roman identities and traditions, creating an unresolvable tension that ultimately led to his violent demise.